We think what we speak

Each language has a toolkit to help us learn what to pay attention to.

So argues Stanford psychology professor Lera Boroditsky during this episode of the Stanford University radio show Entitled Opinions (about Life and Literature) (website, iTunes).

Boroditsky studies how the languages we use influence the way we think. And she’s come up with some startling examples.

For instance, the Kuuk Thaayorre people of northern Australia don’t have words for our concepts of relative location: right, left, forward and back. Instead, when they refer to a location, they always use cardinal directions like north and south. So, they say things like “there is an ant on your southeast leg.” Not surprisingly, these people always know which way is north, even without technology like a compass. That’s a handy skill for a nomadic forager to have.

She has also studied the way languages with grammatical gender influence how people think about everyday objects. For example, the noun “bridge” is feminine in German, but masculine in Spanish. When asked to describe a bridge, German speakers are more likely to use adjectives like beautiful and elegant, while Spanish speakers are more likely to use words like strong and sturdy.

It’s not that languages determine what we think, she notes. People after all create languages. Instead, it’s a two-way street: thought creates language and language creates thought.

(Listening hint: skip the first eight minutes of the interview, which is a long-winded introduction by interviewer Joshua Landy, a Stanford professor of French.)

This entry was posted in Academic podcasts, Five-star professors, Idea of the week, Lectures, Linguistics, Psychology and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to We think what we speak


    Actually it is all depending on the people in urdu there is the sentence {gallat ul aaam} which means what ever all people say that is considered as right wheter it may be wrong.like in English mostly peeople say :-
    what is your good name? it is wrong sentence as ‘good’ as well as ‘name’ are adjectives.
    but people are still using it.
    also there is the problem of different sects which are found in society.

  2. Brad says:

    This was a fantastic lecture, and I’m glad I found this site. I found it especially interesting how aboriginal Australians have the consistent ability to point to any compass direction without external reference. I can’t imagine having that ability. The differences between Spanish and German adjectives paired with a bridge was interesting too.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s