Pondering a leap of faith

If you’ve been following UC Berkeley Professor Ron Hendel’s excellent course The Bible in Western Culture (feed), you know that he’s been looking at understandings of the Bible, beginning in ancient times and moving through the Middle Ages into modernity. In the last couple of weeks we watched as Enlightenment thinkers like Spinoza and Herder grappled with the idea that the Bible is a human rather than a divine creation.

And last week the lectures focused on Kierkegaard, Nietzsche and Kafka, who

Sketch of Søren Kierkegaard by Neils Christian Kierkegaard, c. 1840. Image credit*

Sketch of Søren Kierkegaard by Neils Christian Kierkegaard, c. 1840. Image credit*

each looked into the abyss: a world without revealed truth. Kierkegaard tried the “leap of faith” across the chasm, while Kafka seemed to long to make the leap, but didn’t believe there was anything on the other side. (The lecture on Nietzsche, given by a guest lecturer, wasn’t available on the podcast.)

Both Kierkegaard and Kafka were addressing the existential loneliness that people feel in a world without God. How can we tell good from evil if everything is relative, if all religion is a human creation?

In pondering this, I was reminded of psychologist Jonathan Haidt’s wonderful book, The Happiness Hypothesis (see Book Review: The Happiness Hypothesis). Religion, Haidt says, embodies “moral emotions” that are part of our common biological makeup. Haidt argues that the emotions that foster group cohesion, like awe and respect for authority, are part of religious traditions along with ethical ideals like justice and mercy that appeal to our sense of fairness and our empathy for people in need. (Haidt provides a  short exposition of these ideas in his paper Planet of the Durkheimians. You can learn more and read some sample chapters of his book at Haidt’s website.)

It begins to make sense that devout people  live longer and happier lives. They are living within systems that were adapted to our psychological makeup. So, what’s a modern doubter (like me) to do? I’m not attracted either to Kafka’s ironic existential despair or to Kierkegaard’s “leap of faith.”

I guess I am comforted by the idea that if religions are so well adapted to the human psyche, we can still appreciate our religions and participate in them even if we no longer believe in a God who wrote the Bible or ordained its laws.

Related posts:

*Image credit: Wikipedia, Public Domain.
Advertisements
This entry was posted in Academic podcasts, Bible, Courses, Five-star professors, Idea of the week, Jewish studies, Philosophy, Psychology, Religion and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Pondering a leap of faith

  1. saeed says:

    I will have to check out this course. So many courses…so little time.

  2. Matt says:

    To be exact, it’s not a leap “of” faith, but a leap “to” faith. Faith isn’t the action, it’s the destination. And since the absence of God is just as impossible to prove as his existence, technically being a “doubter” requires faith just like being a Christian does. Congratulations, you made the leap whether you like it or not – you just made it in a different direction, one which is more socially acceptable and thus less “angsty.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s